From owner-freebsd-gecko@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 28 08:16:11 2011 Return-Path: Delivered-To: gecko@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 335EB1065672 for ; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:16:11 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from flo@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D0FD8FC13; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:16:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bender.solomo.local (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id pBS8G9Ee090766; Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:16:10 GMT (envelope-from flo@freebsd.org) Message-ID: <4EFAD049.7000406@freebsd.org> Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 09:16:09 +0100 From: Florian Smeets User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:9.0) Gecko/20111223 Thunderbird/9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." References: <4EF7C66F.9090005@aldan.algebra.com> <4EF81D1C.3090405@FreeBSD.org> <4EF9BC57.8050605@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4EF9BC57.8050605@aldan.algebra.com> X-Enigmail-Version: undefined Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: gecko@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New nss and firefox X-BeenThere: freebsd-gecko@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Gecko Rendering Engine issues List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 08:16:11 -0000 On 27.12.2011 13:38, Mikhail T. wrote: > On 26.12.2011 02:07, Florian Smeets wrote: >> replying only to the nss part of you email. We have nss 3.13.1 in our >> svn tree (not the with CKBI 1.88 version yet, I'll get to it) and we >> decided to wait with updating the version in ports until after FreeBSD >> 9.0-RELEASE. > > Is there a ports-freeze in effect? If not, why can't nss be updated now? > The ports slush is still not completley lifted. We are still in a partial ports thaw. What is it that you need so urgently? We could update only the certdata.txt in security/ca_root_nss, but there should really be a good reason for it. Florian