From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Sep 5 06:26:33 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 425D716A4E5 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 06:26:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: from py-out-1112.google.com (py-out-1112.google.com [64.233.166.179]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B8B5743D66 for ; Tue, 5 Sep 2006 06:26:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jfvogel@gmail.com) Received: by py-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id o67so3277122pye for ; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 23:26:30 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=I2BY0LFHdw/NhGbuxVOzklUn4wRGUoniJUK6u4tm+0jF14GGgdx9ZKCNAlgH5u2kT8KPF/8i7cAV+MO88MRG5TiYdGkPJqP+KH/wFER7eJV48Y9juN1WyOUvfHk7C6gwZqi97QpkYQpas81wdFCugF2om7cOLkk64DH4HIKwWmA= Received: by 10.35.105.18 with SMTP id h18mr9373852pym; Mon, 04 Sep 2006 23:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.35.119.1 with HTTP; Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:26:30 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <2a41acea0609042326y3f020901ja5d020e6734a4b84@mail.gmail.com> Date: Mon, 4 Sep 2006 23:26:30 -0700 From: "Jack Vogel" To: "Gleb Smirnoff" In-Reply-To: <20060904081938.GX40020@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <10fd06c60609031846x60c40383iaee659aa7ee74300@mail.gmail.com> <20060904081938.GX40020@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, "Derrick T. Woolworth" Subject: Re: Jumbo Frames with em X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Sep 2006 06:26:33 -0000 On 9/4/06, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:46:21PM -0500, Derrick T. Woolworth wrote: > D> I'm running -current on a NFS file server with a 3ware controller > D> striping across multiple disks. The box uses the em driver with the > D> mtu set to 8192 - client machines connecting via NFS that are also > D> running -current with bge drivers with the mtu set to 8192 (and jumbo > D> frames enabled on the switch)... > D> > D> The em driver's README says that UDP and Jumbo Frames don't play well > D> together - just wondering if this would have any impact on NFS over > D> TCP? > > This comment is quite old. It may happen that this isn't true anymore. > May be developers from Intel will comment on this. > > D> Does anyone know anything about the future of the em driver or > D> bge driver that might have performance issues with Jumbo Frames? > D> > D> I'm only ever seeing the storage system write about 10 to 15MB (bytes) > D> per second over NFS. > > Have you tested the performance with ftp, netcat or some network > benchmarking tool? The problem may be in NFS not in driver. Its not entirely clear in your post Derrick, are you using TCP or UDP NFS? Jack