From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 5 18:07:13 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4221065676 for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 18:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from services.ipt.ru (services.ipt.ru [194.62.233.110]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A15538FC23 for ; Mon, 5 May 2008 18:07:13 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bsam@ipt.ru) Received: from [85.173.16.77] (helo=localhost.my.domain) by services.ipt.ru with esmtpa (Exim 4.54 (FreeBSD)) id 1Jt55j-0008M2-6Q; Mon, 05 May 2008 22:07:11 +0400 To: stevefranks@ieee.org References: <539c60b90805051042r7a5524a7lebe7417cd96a249c@mail.gmail.com> From: Boris Samorodov Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 22:07:04 +0400 In-Reply-To: <539c60b90805051042r7a5524a7lebe7417cd96a249c@mail.gmail.com> (Steve Franks's message of "Mon\, 5 May 2008 10\:42\:52 -0700") Message-ID: <42083015@ipt.ru> User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (berkeley-unix) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List Subject: Re: wine, amd64, and fc-7 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 May 2008 18:07:14 -0000 Hello Steve, On Mon, 5 May 2008 10:42:52 -0700 Steve Franks wrote: > Anyone try to get an rpm of wine working under linux compat? Did you > have to install fc-7 instead of fc-4? Is fc7 ready for primetime? > Someone said it had issues awhile back. It's not and fc (port) issue, it's rather kernel's one (linux.osrelease 2.4.2 vs 2.6.16 emulation). The default is 2.4.2 even for CURRENT (but mat change soon). And when the default linux.osrelease is changed at CURRENT some time will pass before something like f8 (or even f9) may become a default linux emulation port. > Looks like all the 64-bit linux guys run wine, why don't we? Of FreeBSD doesn't have 64-bit linux emulation, it's 32-bit for now. And afaik no one is working on it. > course, I'd prefer a native FreeBSD port over an rpm if I could get > it... -- WBR, bsam