From owner-freebsd-hackers Fri Jun 7 5:47:11 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AF8537B401; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 05:47:06 -0700 (PDT) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.3/8.12.2) with ESMTP id g57CiRBh012365; Fri, 7 Jun 2002 14:44:27 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from phk@critter.freebsd.dk) To: j mckitrick Cc: Mike Silbersack , John Baldwin , freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: SMP/5.0 performance on single CPU? In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 07 Jun 2002 12:50:04 BST." <20020607125004.A83543@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org> Date: Fri, 07 Jun 2002 14:44:27 +0200 Message-ID: <12364.1023453867@critter.freebsd.dk> From: Poul-Henning Kamp Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20020607125004.A83543@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>, j mckitrick writes: >| On the other hand, there are numerous new features (GEOM, TrustedBSD, >| OpenPAM, Snapshots + background fsck, etc) being implemented in 5.x that > >Other than devfs (which I haven't investigated yet) it seems most of >these features are extras, not the basics, correct? Other than SMP, of >course. It is the intent that GEOM will be standard (or basics if you like). -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message