From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Feb 27 13:20:15 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from dt051n0b.san.rr.com (dt051n0b.san.rr.com [204.210.32.11])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id BE6FE37C234; Sun, 27 Feb 2000 13:20:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from Doug@gorean.org)
Received: from gorean.org (doug@master [10.0.0.2])
	by dt051n0b.san.rr.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id NAA22252;
	Sun, 27 Feb 2000 13:20:11 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from Doug@gorean.org)
Message-ID: <38B9950A.2A0A13@gorean.org>
Date: Sun, 27 Feb 2000 13:20:10 -0800
From: Doug Barton <Doug@gorean.org>
Organization: Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.72 [en] (X11; U; FreeBSD 4.0-CURRENT i386)
X-Accept-Language: en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: obrien@FreeBSD.org
Cc: Satoshi Asami <asami@FreeBSD.org>, ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: QUICK RESPONCE NEEDED:  Netscape 4.72 handling
References: <20000227113708.A18632@dragon.nuxi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

David O'Brien wrote:
> 
> Hi Satoshi,
> 
> I'd like to update Netscape offering on the DEC Alpha to version 4.72.
> Should I do this upgrade in as the netscape47-* ports, or do we need to
> repo copy netscape47-* to netscape472-* ?   Personally, I see 4.72 as a
> minor update to 4.7 and would just assume keep the port names the same.

	Personally I think we should eliminate all of the netscapeN* ports. I
don't see any reason to keep the really old versions. 

Doug
-- 
"Welcome to the desert of the real." 

    - Laurence Fishburne as Morpheus, "The Matrix"


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message