Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 16:10:13 -0800 From: Sean Ellis <sellis@telus.net> To: "Greg 'groggy' Lehey" <grog@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: vinum list anomaly Message-ID: <20040327001013.GC45524@telus.net> In-Reply-To: <20040326233018.GD31700@wantadilla.lemis.com> References: <20040326191245.GA45524@telus.net> <20040326233018.GD31700@wantadilla.lemis.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, Mar 27, 2004 at 10:00:18AM +1030, Greg 'groggy' Lehey wrote: > On Friday, 26 March 2004 at 11:12:45 -0800, Sean Ellis wrote: > > after adding too drives as a concatenated vinum volume I see a line in > > the `vinum list` output which doesn't look right to me. Specifically, the > > line that refers to spanned_log.p0.s0. Is there a typical explanation for > > something like this? > > > > 2 drives: > > D a State: up Device /dev/ad2s1e Avail: > > 10/4110 MB (0%) > > D b State: up Device /dev/ad3s1e Avail: > > 10/4110 MB (0%) > > This looks like your MUA folded it. It should look like this: > > > 2 drives: > > D a State: up Device /dev/ad2s1e Avail: 10/4110 MB (0%) > > D b State: up Device /dev/ad3s1e Avail: 10/4110 MB (0%) Sorry, the pasted in details did lose their formatting. The line that I'm curious about though appears below; the line referring to spanned_log.p0.s0. The two disks are identical, and I thought that I'd prepared them in like fashion, yet one displays "0 B Size" and the other "4100 MB Size". > > S spanned_log.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 4100 MB > > S spanned_log.p0.s1 State: up PO: 4100 MB Size: 4100 MB I've just ran `vinum list` again, and I now have other problems (below), so I will be dealing with them and seeing how things stand at that point. new 'list' S spanned_log.p0.s0 State: up PO: 0 B Size: 4100 MB S spanned_log.p0.s1 State: crashed PO: 4100 MB Size: 4100 MB -- Sean
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040327001013.GC45524>