From owner-freebsd-hackers Thu Mar 9 22:23:39 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id WAA06364 for hackers-outgoing; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:23:39 -0800 Received: from ref.tfs.com (ref.tfs.com [140.145.254.251]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id WAA06358 for ; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:23:38 -0800 Received: (from phk@localhost) by ref.tfs.com (8.6.8/8.6.6) id WAA02651; Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:23:20 -0800 From: Poul-Henning Kamp Message-Id: <199503100623.WAA02651@ref.tfs.com> Subject: Re: SNAP or current? To: gary@wcs.uq.oz.au (Gary Roberts) Date: Thu, 9 Mar 1995 22:23:20 -0800 (PST) Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <9503100621.AA26597@wcs.uq.edu.au> from "Gary Roberts" at Mar 10, 95 04:21:44 pm Content-Type: text Content-Length: 418 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > >From previous comments I've seen, 2.1 is timed for April (perhaps a month > from now). The last SNAP is a month old. If -current is good right now, > is anyone likely to roll a new SNAP? Just curious ... belive me, I'm trying .... -- Poul-Henning Kamp -- TRW Financial Systems, Inc. 'All relevant people are pertinent' && 'All rude people are impertinent' => 'no rude people are relevant'