From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat May 13 19:32:54 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4434F16A408 for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 19:32:54 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from mta13.adelphia.net (mta13.adelphia.net [68.168.78.44]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2EE3343D5D for ; Sat, 13 May 2006 19:32:43 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from fbsd@a1poweruser.com) Received: from barbish ([70.39.69.56]) by mta13.adelphia.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with SMTP id <20060513193243.UYNO9479.mta13.adelphia.net@barbish>; Sat, 13 May 2006 15:32:43 -0400 From: "fbsd" To: "Beech Rintoul" , Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 15:32:38 -0400 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) In-Reply-To: <200605131109.33299.beech@alaskaparadise.com> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1478 Importance: Normal Cc: Subject: RE: Has the port collection become to large to handle. X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: fbsd@a1poweruser.com List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 May 2006 19:32:54 -0000 "As a port maintainer, it's quite enough work to keep things in sync with one ports tree without having to also worry about a second "convenience" tree that will only benefit a few users." This post says nothing about a second "convenience" tree. Talking about a (to use your term) "convenience" category which fits nicely into the category schema all ready being used. Please read the original post more closely so your comments pertains to what was posted.