Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2014 15:35:37 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: x11@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 191776] Request add developer version of Xorg x11/xorg-devel Message-ID: <bug-191776-7141-htMSkaMuRi@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-191776-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> References: <bug-191776-7141@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191776 --- Comment #8 from Jean-Sébastien Pédron <dumbbell@FreeBSD.org> --- Mesa 10.3 is available now on upcoming FreeBSD 10.1-RELEASE. Mesa 9.1 is still the version provided on FreeBSD 8.x, 9.x and 10.0. The problem is our Intel driver which gain a feature required by Mesa 9.2 and later in 10.1-RELEASE only. xf86-video-ati-7.5.0 will be available in the future too. We didn't commit 7.4.0 because it crashes for some users. So as soon as we are comfortable with 7.5.0, it will hit the Ports tree. Now, xserver 1.15 or 1.16 is another problem. It depends on Mesa 9.2 which isn't available on all releases, as mentionned above. We could resurrect some kind of WITH_NEW_XORG but I'm sure no developer wants that again. It's a real pain to maintain, difficult to implement properly (ie. with options to permit all combinations desired by the users) and very confusing for everyone in the end. It took us a long time to get rid of it, we don't want to add it again now :) The real proper solution is to implement the "Provides" feature I talked about in my previous comment. Meanwhile, there's the xorg-dev repository for users willing to use more modern ports. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are the assignee for the bug.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-191776-7141-htMSkaMuRi>