From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jun 5 04:55:34 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6753916A468 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:55:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (pool-71-117-239-32.ptldor.fios.verizon.net [71.117.239.32]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 46BB013C465 for ; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:55:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com) Received: from schitzo.solgatos.com (localhost.home.localnet [127.0.0.1]) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id l554tV14008247 for ; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:55:31 -0700 Received: from sopwith.solgatos.com (uucp@localhost) by schitzo.solgatos.com (8.13.8/8.13.4/Submit) with UUCP id l554tV3O008244 for freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org; Mon, 4 Jun 2007 21:55:31 -0700 Received: from localhost by sopwith.solgatos.com (8.8.8/6.24) id EAA17749; Tue, 5 Jun 2007 04:51:20 GMT Message-Id: <200706050451.EAA17749@sopwith.solgatos.com> To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2007 21:51:20 +0100 From: Dieter Subject: Re: Non-raid PCIe SATA controller with 8 ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list Reply-To: freebsd@sopwith.solgatos.com List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 05 Jun 2007 04:55:34 -0000 > - as you mentioned, without the battery backup the cache on the > controller would have to be write-through, which disabled much of > the advantage of the thing. > I can't have NCQ on the NVidia SATA ports, Yes, very annoying to choose hardware that supports NCQ and then discover you can't use it due to no software support. :-( Surely someone can translate this from penguin to daemon? http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/jgarzik/libata/archive/2.6.17-nv-adma.patch.bz2 > and hence have to use the disk's write cache. Huh? Is a write-back cache in a disk somehow safer than a write-back cache in a controller? We really really need NCQ. :-/