From owner-freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jun 1 16:12:36 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCEA716A41F for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 16:12:36 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from auriate.fluffles.net (cust.95.160.adsl.cistron.nl [195.64.95.160]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95CB013C45A for ; Fri, 1 Jun 2007 16:12:34 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from etc@fluffles.net) Received: from 195-241-125-45.dsl.ip.tiscali.nl ([195.241.125.45] helo=[10.0.0.18]) by auriate.fluffles.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.66 (FreeBSD)) (envelope-from ) id 1Hu9Ma-0003sR-2L; Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:48:28 +0200 Message-ID: <46603FD2.8070400@fluffles.net> Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 17:48:34 +0200 From: Fluffles User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Martin Cracauer References: <20070601144512.GA51002@cons.org> In-Reply-To: <20070601144512.GA51002@cons.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Non-raid PCIe SATA controller with 8 ports? X-BeenThere: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: General discussion of FreeBSD hardware List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:12:36 -0000 Martin Cracauer wrote: > Hi, > > is there any PCIe SATA controller with 8 ports that has decent FreeBSD > drivers, including NCQ, and decent performance on the level of the ICH > or Nvidia onboard ports? > As far as i know, there's no NCQ for the ata(4) driver, so you can only use SCSI TCQ and NCQ on a true hardware controller like Areca. I think you need either a motherboard with 8 onboard connectors, multiple PCI/PCIe cards or a hardware controller like HighPoint RocketRaid 2320 PCI-e with 8 ports. This last one is quite affordable and has quite good driver support i think. > I don't need hardware RAID. I suppose I can use an 8-port Areca as a > dumb controller, but that's kinda wastish. > Well, an Areca might give you the flexibility to use true RAID and even on single disks you can benefit from increased performance due to request reordering and the onboard buffercache. Be aware that any controller with write-back cache offers a potential dataloss risk, without the use of a battery backup unit (BBU). Also, if you need performance, why would you want to use an Areca as a normal controller, why not pick RAID0 or RAID5? Do you really need 8 seperate disks? - Veronica