Date: Mon, 13 Jul 2009 10:39:55 -0300 From: Henrique Almeida <hdante@gmail.com> To: "Carlos A. M. dos Santos" <unixmania@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Help on relicensing derived code Message-ID: <c23df7cb0907130639peff57dfjf354ad1ed9c22929@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <e71790db0907130626q59cbab51gb948d598448e5fa2@mail.gmail.com> References: <c23df7cb0907121220m45b84fc7te4d6ba2e3f556d77@mail.gmail.com> <e71790db0907122124v5acfa820na285b8c0bbf0c683@mail.gmail.com> <c23df7cb0907130557h2b6304e5g4e55190d66a16b68@mail.gmail.com> <c23df7cb0907130557u8f04aeera77de24335494b39@mail.gmail.com> <e71790db0907130626q59cbab51gb948d598448e5fa2@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/7/13 Carlos A. M. dos Santos <unixmania@gmail.com>: > If you are writing your own version of errno.h then it is not a > derived work. In this particular case, errno.h is just a list of error > codes so you can copy/paste the numbers and mnemonics from the output > of "man 2 intro". That would be considered "compatible code", not Perfect. I told you I would be able to use uniform licensing. ;-) -- Henrique Dante de Almeida hdante@gmail.com
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?c23df7cb0907130639peff57dfjf354ad1ed9c22929>