From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Thu Mar 30 22:34:00 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A948BD26275; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rezny@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA6DBD0; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:34:00 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rezny@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1406) id B0EED47B4; Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:33:59 +0000 (UTC) From: Matthew Rezny To: Alexey Dokuchaev Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, owner-ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r437215 - in head/graphics: gbm libEGL libGL libglapi Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2017 00:33:59 +0200 Message-ID: <1928103.EQLZasdYMK@workstation.reztek> Organization: FreeBSD User-Agent: KMail/4.14.10 (FreeBSD/11.0-STABLE; KDE/4.14.30; amd64; ; ) In-Reply-To: <20170330221811.GA82143@FreeBSD.org> References: <201703291657.v2TGvrpM076369@repo.freebsd.org> <2248499.et5buujvh1@workstation.reztek> <20170330221811.GA82143@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2017 22:34:00 -0000 On Thursday 30 March 2017 22:18:11 Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > On Thu, Mar 30, 2017 at 09:38:22PM +0200, Matthew Rezny wrote: > > While I've got your attention, could I trouble you to check out PR 217341 > > and commit it before the quarterly branch if it looks good? > > Will do; there are few PRs that I need to address ASAP and that's one of > them, thanks for reminding. > > > Also, is nvidia-driver something that you want to maintain, or should > > x11@ take up maintainership? > > I'm always considering it, but every time someone tries to update it they > will forget to take legacy ports into account, or do not bother to get > those OSVERSIONS checks accurate enough, or something else. I'll happily > let it go under x11@ wing after I can see that enough meta-knowledge is > being preserved among its regular committers, if that's OK with you. > > ./danfe That is more than ok. I really appreciate the desire to impart your knowledge to ensure proper care taking as opposed to tossing a hot potato. I will observe until you signal for my further involvement. I am frequently available on IRC, if you want to tap me for anything do not hesitate.