Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 14:23:06 +0200 From: "Andrey S. Rybak" <ra@iop.kiev.ua> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD local r00t zeroday Message-ID: <4B165C2A.9000708@iop.kiev.ua> In-Reply-To: <20091201114233.GB26501@icarus.home.lan> References: <e27b2fdf0912010304g3718202di66d4eac2abae2045@mail.gmail.com> <20091201114233.GB26501@icarus.home.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > On Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 06:04:05PM +0700, ~Lst wrote: > >> Hello all, >> >> What d'you think about this ? >> http://seclists.org/fulldisclosure/2009/Nov/371 >> > > Are you actually asking for an opinions of a security hole, or are you > just trying to bring it to our attention? An official statement was > already issued to freebsd-security about 10 hours ago: > > http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-security/2009-December/005369.html > Where is detailed instruction? I can not find ... I can't apply the patch: # cd /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf/ [root@mymachin /usr/src/libexec/rtld-elf]# patch <rtld.patch Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... The text leading up to this was: -------------------------- |Index: rtld.c |=================================================================== |--- rtld.c (revision 199977) |+++ rtld.c (working copy) -------------------------- Patching file rtld.c using Plan A... Hunk #1 failed at 366. 1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to rtld.c.rej done What is wrong? Thanks in advance.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B165C2A.9000708>