From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Feb 17 13:59:10 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 41EF416A4D0
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:59:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: from postfix3-2.free.fr (postfix3-2.free.fr [213.228.0.169])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1748D43D1D
	for <ports@freebsd.org>; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:59:10 -0800 (PST)
	(envelope-from llevier@argosnet.com)
Received: from osgiliath.argosnet.com
	(stbarthelemy-2-82-224-1-141.fbx.proxad.net [82.224.1.141])
	by postfix3-2.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id C909CC2B6; Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:59:08 +0100 (CET)
Message-Id: <6.0.1.1.2.20040217225726.01e2a408@213.30.158.180>
X-Sender: llevier@213.30.158.180
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 6.0.1.1
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:59:06 +0100
To: Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@komquats.com>
From: Laurent LEVIER <llevier@argosnet.com>
In-Reply-To: <200402172015.i1HKFeEd022641@cwsys.cwsent.com>
References: <200402172015.i1HKFeEd022641@cwsys.cwsent.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
cc: ports@freebsd.org
cc: Jens Schweikhardt <schweikh@schweikhardt.net>
Subject: Re: Ports with duplicate LATEST_LINKS 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:59:10 -0000


>Should I commit the following patch to correct the wording?
Nope, that is the correct definition.
Except my abuse of uppercased letters ;-)

@+

Laurent LEVIER
Systems & Networks Security Expert, CISSP CISM