From owner-freebsd-current Thu Nov 23 12:40:45 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (adsl-63-202-178-138.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [63.202.178.138]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EAD137B4D7 for <current@freebsd.org>; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 12:40:43 -0800 (PST) Received: from mass.osd.bsdi.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mass.osd.bsdi.com (8.11.0/8.11.1) with ESMTP id eANKm9F01796; Thu, 23 Nov 2000 12:48:09 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from msmith@mass.osd.bsdi.com) Message-Id: <200011232048.eANKm9F01796@mass.osd.bsdi.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 To: Alan Cox <alc@cs.rice.edu> Cc: Mikulas Patocka <mikulas@artax.karlin.mff.cuni.cz>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: page coloring In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 23 Nov 2000 14:35:30 CST." <20001123143530.E21300@cs.rice.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Thu, 23 Nov 2000 12:48:09 -0800 From: Mike Smith <msmith@freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > Isn't the page coloring algoritm in _vm_page_list_find totally bogus? > > > > No, it's not. The comment is, however, misplaced. It describes > the behavior of an inline function in vm_page.h, and not the function > it precedes. Hrm. My comment was based on John Dyson's own observations on its behaviour, and other discussions which concluded that the code wasn't flexible enough (hardcoded assumptions on cache organisation, size etc.) If this isn't applicable, my apologies for confusing the matter. -- ... every activity meets with opposition, everyone who acts has his rivals and unfortunately opponents also. But not because people want to be opponents, rather because the tasks and relationships force people to take different points of view. [Dr. Fritz Todt] V I C T O R Y N O T V E N G E A N C E To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message