From owner-freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 31 12:40:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-amd64@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAA8416B for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:40:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206c::16:87]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F4238FC0A for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:40:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q9VCe1eq024698 for ; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q9VCe1R4024697; Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:40:01 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:40:01 GMT Message-Id: <201210311240.q9VCe1R4024697@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-amd64@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tommy_Sonne_Alstr=F8m?= Subject: Re: amd64/173235: Have received two crashes within 1 day after installing new packages: Fatal trap 12: page fault in kernel mode X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:04:22 +0000 X-BeenThere: freebsd-amd64@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list Reply-To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tommy_Sonne_Alstr=F8m?= List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the AMD64 platform List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 12:40:01 -0000 The following reply was made to PR amd64/173235; it has been noted by GNATS. From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Tommy_Sonne_Alstr=F8m?= To: Andriy Gapon Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: amd64/173235: Have received two crashes within 1 day after installing new packages: Fatal trap 12: page fault in kernel mode Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 13:35:35 +0100 Thanks for the answer. Please note, that I had no network shares mounted when the 2nd crash occurred. Sorry if I chose the wrong category. BR Tommy On 10/31/2012 01:31 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote: > This looks like an smbfs/netsmb related bug. > > P.S. There was no reason to chose 'amd64' category.