From owner-svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Fri Dec 22 16:42:33 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id ADAB3EA3C6E; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [96.47.72.132]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "freefall.freebsd.org", Issuer "Let's Encrypt Authority X3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8C2147DC7B; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:42:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from danfe@freebsd.org) Received: by freefall.freebsd.org (Postfix, from userid 1033) id D558E5C54; Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:42:32 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:42:32 +0000 From: Alexey Dokuchaev To: araujo@freebsd.org Cc: Mark Linimon , ports-committers , svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r456901 - in head: biology/avida biology/gmap devel/amd64-gcc devel/k8048 devel/kyra devel/php-uprofiler games/supertuxkart graphics/cimg multimedia/handbrake net/tcpkali security/massc... Message-ID: <20171222164232.GA28300@FreeBSD.org> References: <201712211023.vBLANJrQ072021@repo.freebsd.org> <20171222151442.GA60985@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.2 (2017-12-15) X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 16:42:33 -0000 On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 12:20:00AM +0800, Marcelo Araujo wrote: > 2017-12-22 23:14 GMT+08:00 Alexey Dokuchaev : > > On Thu, Dec 21, 2017 at 10:23:19AM +0000, Mark Linimon wrote: > > > New Revision: 456901 > > > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/456901 > > > > > > Log: > > > Try to bring some consistency to ports that have x86-specific pieces. > > > > > > - in general, if we think that the code is not architecture-specific, > > > and instead just enables x86 assembler by default, those should > > > use BROKEN rather than IGNORE. This will allow them to be attempted > > > with TRYBROKEN. > > > - spell i386 as x86. > > > - spell asm as assembler. > > > > Thank you; updated messages (reasons) read much nicer now. > > Is your reply really necessary? It's more than just a "thank you"; I'm hoping to drag attention to other people who write BROKEN_* messages to the importance of the accurate and coherent wording. I'm sorry that it had offended you. Peace, ./danfe