From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed May 28 23:36:18 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id XAA28478 for hackers-outgoing; Wed, 28 May 1997 23:36:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: from argus.nuke.net (node15.tfs.net [207.2.220.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA28472 for ; Wed, 28 May 1997 23:36:15 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from jbryant@localhost) by argus.nuke.net (8.8.5/8.8.5) id BAA00758; Thu, 29 May 1997 01:36:03 -0500 (CDT) From: Jim Bryant Message-Id: <199705290636.BAA00758@argus.nuke.net> Subject: Re: IP over SCSI To: black@zen.cypher.net (Ben Black) Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 01:36:02 -0500 (CDT) Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Reply-To: jbryant@tfs.net In-Reply-To: from "Ben Black" at May 29, 97 01:52:50 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk In reply: > has anyone thought about this for FreeBSD? > > http://www.cis.ohio-state.edu/htbin/rfc/rfc2143.html why? Only possible use would be SNMP, and that can be achieved much easier by the host... I want to see the TELNET SUBLIMINAL OPTION implemented... jim -- All opinions expressed are mine, if you | "I will not be pushed, stamped, think otherwise, then go jump into turbid | briefed, debriefed, indexed, or radioactive waters and yell WAHOO !!! | numbered!" - #1, "The Prisoner" jbryant@tfs.net - KC5VDJ 2M, 70cm, KPC-3+ - kc5vdj@wv0t.#neks.ks.usa.noam