Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2010 18:09:26 +0200 From: Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn@googlemail.com> To: gljennjohn@googlemail.com Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org>, FreeBSD-Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: One-shot-oriented event timers management Message-ID: <20100901180926.4b04e2cc@ernst.jennejohn.org> In-Reply-To: <20100901141541.3e36c868@ernst.jennejohn.org> References: <4C7A5C28.1090904@FreeBSD.org> <20100830110932.23425932@ernst.jennejohn.org> <4C7B82EA.2040104@FreeBSD.org> <20100830121148.11926306@ernst.jennejohn.org> <20100831102918.4f5404cc@ernst.jennejohn.org> <4C7CC1DE.1080907@FreeBSD.org> <4C7E2E8A.3030709@FreeBSD.org> <20100901141541.3e36c868@ernst.jennejohn.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 14:15:41 +0200 Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn@googlemail.com> wrote: > On Wed, 01 Sep 2010 13:44:26 +0300 > Alexander Motin <mav@FreeBSD.org> wrote: > > Updated patch: http://people.freebsd.org/~mav/timers_oneshot6.patch > > > > Patch also includes some optimizations to reduce lock contention. > > > > Thanks for testing. > > > > OK, I'll give it a try, althought your previous patch seems to be working > quite well. > This has changed the behavior of the HPET timers somewhat. With patch5 I was seeing approximately equal interrupt counts from hpet0 and hpet1. Now the majority of interrupts are on hpet0 by a factor of 6 to 10. Not a show stopper, just thought I'd mention it. One difference is that I didn't apply tm6292_idle.patch this time. -- Gary Jennejohn
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20100901180926.4b04e2cc>