Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 08 Aug 2001 23:58:56 -0600
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        David Scheidt <dscheidt@enteract.com>, Greg Lehey <grog@FreeBSD.ORG>
Cc:        Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org>, <tlambert2@mindspring.com>, j mckitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org>, <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   Re: How did the MSFT monopoly start?
Message-ID:  <4.3.2.7.2.20010808235726.0444bba0@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.32L2.0108090035270.58215-100000@shell-2.enterac t.com>
References:  <20010809130711.I73579@wantadilla.lemis.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 11:40 PM 8/8/2001, David Scheidt wrote:

>:> I don't recall the model numbers on the IBM machines at all. Could the
>:> 5100 have been the lab machine mentioned above?
>:
>:I don't think so.  It was billed as a personal computer.  I saw one
>:once in the late 70's: we were an IBM shop at the time, and they tried
>:to sell one to us, in vain.  IIRC it was an integrated box, keyboard,
>:monitor and CPU, not expandable.
>
>I think this was the IBM 9000?

It was the 5100. Yes, it was all in a single case. And it ran APL.
I played with one as an undergrad at Case Tech. Few people knew
APL, so the system mostly sat idle.

--Brett


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.3.2.7.2.20010808235726.0444bba0>