From owner-freebsd-mobile Mon Sep 6 2:36: 5 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Received: from mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (ha1.rdc1.sfba.home.com [24.0.0.66]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E35315293 for ; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 02:36:02 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from charon@freethought.org) Received: from c40948-a ([24.11.129.121]) by mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com (InterMail v4.01.01.00 201-229-111) with SMTP id <19990906093602.OCF21497.mail.rdc1.sfba.home.com@c40948-a>; Mon, 6 Sep 1999 02:36:02 -0700 Message-Id: <3.0.5.32.19990906023601.009de340@mail> X-Sender: tuathadedanann@mail X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Pro Version 3.0.5 (32) Date: Mon, 06 Sep 1999 02:36:01 -0700 To: Alexander Maret , "'freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org'" From: charon@freethought.org Subject: Re: PAO on a 3.2 Stable system???? In-Reply-To: <58A002A02C5ED311812E0050044517F00D231A@ERLANGEN01> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Sender: owner-freebsd-mobile@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org At 10:22 AM 9/6/99 +0200, Alexander Maret wrote: >Hi, > >I know that PAO is supposed to be used with FreeBSD 3.2 Release >systems. But what happens if I do a CVS-update to 3.2 Stable and >then re-apply the PAO patches. Will this work or is it not possible >to use PAO on Stable systems without further hacking. I don't believe it will work, since both PAO and -STABLE assume that they're the only thing that's messed with your system files. I tried loading PAO on a -STABLE system recently, but it didn't work because (I think) PAO was trying to modify a file already changed in -STABLE, and not expecting that, PAO crashed. -Charon To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message