From owner-freebsd-java@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Sep 8 21:33:04 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-java@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C1CFF16A4CE for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 21:33:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from mail.oplnk.net (smtp.oplink.net [216.90.3.140]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9524543D48 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 21:33:04 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from mark@icsaccess.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.oplnk.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36A58E2C98 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:32:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mail.oplnk.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 25576-10 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:32:53 -0500 (CDT) Received: from mobileone (209-176-49-23.oplnk.net [209.176.49.23]) by mail.oplnk.net (Postfix) with SMTP id F1BB5E2C97 for ; Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:32:52 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <018901c495eb$6ff29ac0$1502a8c0@mobileone> From: "Mark Van Orman" To: References: <017301c495e8$a009e1d0$1502a8c0@mobileone> <1094678765.325.1.camel@fast.mmercer.com> Date: Wed, 8 Sep 2004 16:33:09 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1437 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1441 X-Virus-and-Spam-Scanned: by oplink.net email shield Subject: Re: ports: jdk13 vs diablo-jdk13 X-BeenThere: freebsd-java@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting Java to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 21:33:04 -0000 Thanks Michael. It's really impractical that they have it this way. A lot of the java ports are dependent on the diablo-jdk port and not the vanilla jdk. Now that I've already installed the vanilla jdk I'll have to also install the diablo port. The vanilla jdk I installed is 14, so all ports will actually use the older (1.3) diablo implementation if I do install it. Is there a way to make the ports use the vanilla 1.4 implementation instead of the diablo 1.3 now that I have it installed? Regards and thanks, Mark Van Orman mark@icsaccess.com ----- Original Message ----- From: "Michael E Mercer" To: "Mark Van Orman" Cc: Sent: Wednesday, September 08, 2004 4:26 PM Subject: Re: ports: jdk13 vs diablo-jdk13 > If I understand it correctly, they are both the same as far as the > source is concerned. However diablo is FreeBSD's binary version that has > been "blessed" by SUN. The jdk13 port would actually compile the source > on your machine. > > HTH > Michael > > On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 17:13, Mark Van Orman wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Would someone please explain to me the difference between jdk13 and diablo-jdk13. Why would I install one and not the other? > > > > I couldn't find any online resources explaining the difference between the two ports. > > > > > > > > Regards and thanks, > > > > Mark Van Orman > > mark@icsaccess.com > > _______________________________________________ > > freebsd-java@freebsd.org mailing list > > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-java > > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-java-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > --- > [This e-mail was scanned for viruses by Webjogger's AntiVirus Protection System] > >