From owner-freebsd-security Fri Jul 31 06:52:32 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA26483 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 06:52:32 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from copernicus.cpt.tech.iafrica.com (copernicus.cpt.tech.iafrica.com [196.31.1.15]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA26471 for ; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 06:52:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from sheldonh@iafrica.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=iafrica.com ident=[x0IhkJC8NmeeQDXJzceWIFXfkakhbkej]) by copernicus.cpt.tech.iafrica.com with esmtp (Exim 1.92 #1) for security@FreeBSD.ORG id 0z2Fam-0000mi-00; Fri, 31 Jul 1998 15:51:32 +0200 From: Sheldon Hearn To: security@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: INFO REQ: Fagan Inspections In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 24 Jul 1998 11:08:52 +0200." <19980724110852.62387@follo.net> Date: Fri, 31 Jul 1998 15:51:32 +0200 Message-ID: <3019.901893092@iafrica.com> Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Fri, 24 Jul 1998 11:08:52 +0200, Eivind Eklund wrote: > Inspections (or "Fagan inspections" if you want) work. [...] From a > personal viewpoint (I didn't measure this), they seemed much more > effective than just doing reviews. Hi folks, I really don't want to start another off-topic thread with this request, so I think it's best that any replies come directly to me and I'll post a digest of feedback in a few days. It sounded very much like you folks were talking about a formalized system for auditing development cycles and code itself. I'd be very interested in having a look at any documentation that may exist. Any pointers to information online or in print (ISBN pls) would be fantastic. Thanks, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe security" in the body of the message