From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Oct 16 16:20:33 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37AF116A41F for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:20:33 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: from mail.ecolines.ru (ns.ecolines.ru [81.3.181.213]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 26F6C43D49 for ; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:20:31 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: (qmail 5706 invoked from network); 16 Oct 2005 16:23:02 -0000 Received: from dialup84107-101.ip.peterstar.net (HELO doom.homeunix.org) (ip@84.204.107.101) by mail.ecolines.ru with ESMTPA; 16 Oct 2005 16:23:02 -0000 Received: from doom.homeunix.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by doom.homeunix.org (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id j9GGHO9P000736; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 20:18:17 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igor@doom.homeunix.org) Received: (from igor@localhost) by doom.homeunix.org (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j9G76hO6000457; Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:06:43 +0400 (MSD) (envelope-from igor) Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 11:06:43 +0400 From: Igor Pokrovsky To: Michael Nottebrock Message-ID: <20051016070643.GA379@doom.homeunix.org> Mail-Followup-To: Michael Nottebrock , freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Palle Girgensohn References: <82117273F2B3D8076639D8D3@palle.girgensohn.se> <20051014191154.GA3238@doom.homeunix.org> <200510142149.54931.lofi@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200510142149.54931.lofi@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Palle Girgensohn Subject: Re: linking problems with heimdal in base (ports version works) X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Oct 2005 16:20:33 -0000 On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 09:49:51PM +0200, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > On Friday, 14. October 2005 21:11, Igor Pokrovsky wrote: > > > > Still, isn't it strange that the kerberos libs don't have any > > > dependencies registered? A quick check shows that they are almost the > > > only libs in /usr/lib that have zero output from ldd. > > > > Probably they are statically linked. > > No, static libraries don't come with an .so extension. :-) No, you missed my point. I mean that kerberos libs are dynamic but linked against other libraries statically. But they are still dynamic itself. :-) -ip -- The love letter you finally got the courage to send will be delayed in the mail long enough for you to make a fool of yourself in person.