From owner-cvs-all Sun Oct 8 23:42: 4 2000 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from lucifer.ninth-circle.org (lucifer.bart.nl [194.158.168.74]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BCE537B502; Sun, 8 Oct 2000 23:42:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from asmodai@localhost) by lucifer.ninth-circle.org (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e996fsL80198; Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:41:54 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from asmodai) Date: Mon, 9 Oct 2000 08:41:54 +0200 From: Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven To: Nick Hibma Cc: Warner Losh , cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc inetd.conf Message-ID: <20001009084154.A80007@lucifer.bart.nl> References: <200010081713.LAA02405@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: ; from n_hibma@qubesoft.com on Sun, Oct 08, 2000 at 06:34:19PM +0100 Organisation: VIA Net.Works The Netherlands Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG -On [20001008 21:00], Nick Hibma (n_hibma@qubesoft.com) wrote: >I do think so. This is more of a change in mindset than >functionality. People installing any of the versions will expect the >external interface of the box to be similar independent of the version. Although I have backed it out I just wanted to note my agreement with Nick here. All the people I have seen using FreeBSD expect the etc system to be kind of the same on all versions. Maybe that it differs per country or something. But I am talking users and administrators in the Netherlands here. -- Jeroen Ruigrok van der Werven Network- and systemadministrator VIA Net.Works The Netherlands BSD: Technical excellence at its best http://www.via-net-works.nl Grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change, courage to change the things I can, and wisdom to know the difference... To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message