From owner-svn-src-stable@freebsd.org Sat Mar 31 14:14:32 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-src-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8D15F63EB4; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:14:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (br1.CN84in.dnsmgr.net [69.59.192.140]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4AF628584D; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:14:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: from pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3) with ESMTP id w2VEEP0r073632; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 07:14:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net) Received: (from freebsd@localhost) by pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net (8.13.3/8.13.3/Submit) id w2VEEPOi073631; Sat, 31 Mar 2018 07:14:25 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from freebsd) From: "Rodney W. Grimes" Message-Id: <201803311414.w2VEEPOi073631@pdx.rh.CN85.dnsmgr.net> Subject: Re: svn commit: r331838 - in stable/11: . contrib/compiler-rt/include/sanitizer contrib/compiler-rt/include/xray contrib/compiler-rt/lib/BlocksRuntime contrib/compiler-rt/lib/asan contrib/compiler-rt/l... In-Reply-To: <20180331131818.GA22697@lonesome.com> To: Mark Linimon Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 07:14:25 -0700 (PDT) CC: Dimitry Andric , Antoine Brodin , svn-src-stable@FreeBSD.org, svn-src-all@FreeBSD.org, src-committers , re , svn-src-stable-11@FreeBSD.org Reply-To: rgrimes@FreeBSD.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL121h (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII X-BeenThere: svn-src-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for all the -stable branches of the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2018 14:14:33 -0000 > On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 02:42:01PM +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > > It's been almost 3 months now since clang 6 landed in head, and if > > those ports require USE_CXXSTD=gnu++98 to be fixed, why haven't those > > already been changed already? > > Because it takes a lot of time and effort to do it? > > This basically torpedoes the work I've been trying to do to catch tier-2 > up to tier-1, on 11. I had been trying to to identify all the problems > that existed beforehand, before starting in on the clang6 ones. (Many > people have also been contributing to fixing clang6/amd64/current errors, > and I wanted to let the work settle, and not duplicate.) > > Finally, if this had gone in just two days later, it would not have > affected the Q2 package builds. I could have lived with that a lot more > easily. > > I am very disappointed in the timing of this change. Another example of the projects failure to communicate. This bad timing could of been avoided if a pre commit email could of been sent out saying that this was about to be commited. We need to let each other know -pre- commit if we are going to do something with wide impact. I would consider updating any toolchain item in a stable/ branch to be a wide impact. Further I would support a request to have this backed out and reapplied at a later date. Regards, -- Rod Grimes rgrimes@freebsd.org