From owner-freebsd-hardware Thu Jan 9 14:59:57 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id OAA26840 for hardware-outgoing; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:59:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from who.cdrom.com (who.cdrom.com [204.216.27.3]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id OAA26833 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:59:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from pegasus.com (pegasus.com [140.174.243.13]) by who.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.11) with SMTP id OAA16319 for ; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 14:59:53 -0800 (PST) Received: by pegasus.com (8.6.8/PEGASUS-2.2) id KAA05634; Thu, 9 Jan 1997 10:50:33 -1000 Date: Thu, 9 Jan 1997 10:50:33 -1000 From: richard@pegasus.com (Richard Foulk) Message-Id: <199701092050.KAA05634@pegasus.com> In-Reply-To: Simon Reading "Recommend 8mm exabyte drives?" (Jan 9, 6:58pm) X-Mailer: Mail User's Shell (7.2.5 10/14/92) To: freebsd-hardware@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Recommend 8mm exabyte drives? Sender: owner-hardware@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk } } I'm considering 8mm exabyte as a (?more reliable) alternative to 4mm DAT. } } Would you recommend these drives? } I've been using them for many years with good results. I have the $300 2Gig unit at home which works well with $3 Sony video tapes. And I use a number of 14Gig units at work, including a two-drive ten-tape juke-box (SparcStorage Library) which all work fairly well. We stick with official data quality tapes for the higher capacity units. Mostly, you just need to clean them regularly. And if you use them heavily the heads will wear out -- though apparently much less quickly than on DAT drives. There are also fewer compatibility problems between different drives with Exabytes than with DATs. Fewer different formats. Richard