From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon May 26 07:57:17 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 35E1337B401
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 May 2003 07:57:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 381B443F75
	for <current@freebsd.org>; Mon, 26 May 2003 07:57:16 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h4QEvELp022768;
	Mon, 26 May 2003 16:57:14 +0200 (CEST)
	(envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk)
To: Christophe Zwecker <doc@zwecker.de>
From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk>
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 26 May 2003 16:51:02 +0200."
             <3ED229D6.70901@zwecker.de> 
Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 16:57:14 +0200
Message-ID: <22767.1053961034@critter.freebsd.dk>
cc: current@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: gbde Performance - 35Mb/s vs 5.2 MB/s 
X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current
	<freebsd-current.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-current>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current>,
	<mailto:freebsd-current-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 26 May 2003 14:57:17 -0000

In message <3ED229D6.70901@zwecker.de>, Christophe Zwecker writes:
>P
>>>
>>>Could anyone tell me if this is supposed to be slow like that ? Or is
>>>there anything I missed ?
>> 
>> 
>> This sounds pretty likely for write performance.
>> 
>ok, good to know, just wanted to know if I did everything right. Do you 
>think write performance will improve alot or do you focus on other things ?

The primary objective of GBDE was security, and it will always be.
But I try to not totally toast performance :-)

The next leap in GBDE performance will be hardware assisted AES crypto.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp       | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20
phk@FreeBSD.ORG         | TCP/IP since RFC 956
FreeBSD committer       | BSD since 4.3-tahoe    
Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.