From owner-freebsd-security Fri Sep 22 00:25:41 1995 Return-Path: owner-security Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) id AAA18333 for security-outgoing; Fri, 22 Sep 1995 00:25:41 -0700 Received: from cheops.anu.edu.au (avalon@cheops.anu.edu.au [150.203.76.24]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.6.12/8.6.6) with ESMTP id AAA18322 for ; Fri, 22 Sep 1995 00:25:35 -0700 Message-Id: <199509220725.AAA18322@freefall.freebsd.org> Received: by cheops.anu.edu.au (1.37.109.16/16.2) id AA269294535; Fri, 22 Sep 1995 17:22:15 +1000 From: Darren Reed Subject: Re: IP Filter version 2.8 To: Guido.vanRooij@nl.cis.philips.com Date: Fri, 22 Sep 1995 17:22:15 +1000 (EST) Cc: pst@cisco.com, security@freebsd.org In-Reply-To: from "Guido van Rooij" at Sep 22, 95 08:53:33 am X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 689 Sender: owner-security@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk In some mail from Guido van Rooij, sie said: > > Guido van Rooij wrote: > > > > Paul Traina wrote: > > > > > > Should we be incorporating Darren's new code into FreeBSD? It makes > > > more sense to do that than to continue with Ugen's work on top of > > > the old code. > > > > > > > I agree. Darren's code is more used and thus it'll get more bugfixes > > and updates. > > > > I don't know about licenses. > > > > Btw: do not forget that Darren's code has no accounting possibilities. > Ugen's has. What are the requirements for accounting ? And why is an in-kernel mod. used for this rather than something like NNstat ? NNstat is much more powerful for this role. darren