Date: Wed, 8 Mar 1995 01:50:08 -0800 From: asami@cs.berkeley.edu (Satoshi Asami/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCQHUbKEI=?= =?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOCsbKEIgGyRCOC0bKEI=?=) To: smace@metal-mail.neosoft.com Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Japanese packages Message-ID: <199503080950.BAA15557@forgery.CS.Berkeley.EDU> In-Reply-To: <199503080023.RAA02311@metal.ops.neosoft.com> (message from Scott Mace on Tue, 7 Mar 1995 17:23:02 -0700 (MST))
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
* From: Scott Mace <smace@metal-mail.neosoft.com> * > I think it might be easier for users to find them if I just put them * > all under a new directory under /usr/ports, say /usr/ports/japanese or * * I think this is the way to go... It would be much less confusing... Ok, I've got two "yes" votes and no "no" votes so far...is it okay for other people? By the way, another question for the CVS folks...about the name of the subdirectories. Should I call them, say, /usr/ports/japanese/less or /usr/ports/japanese/jless? I don't think the former will cause any real confusion, but will kinda violate the clean orthogonality in the module names, as jless -> ports/japanese/less. Is this acceptable? Satoshi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199503080950.BAA15557>