From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon May 27 13:56:33 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 677EF93E; Mon, 27 May 2013 13:56:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Received: from woozle.rinet.ru (woozle.rinet.ru [195.54.192.68]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBCA55E0; Mon, 27 May 2013 13:56:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by woozle.rinet.ru (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r4RDuO9F051974; Mon, 27 May 2013 17:56:24 +0400 (MSK) (envelope-from marck@rinet.ru) Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 17:56:24 +0400 (MSK) From: Dmitry Morozovsky To: Pete French Subject: Re: Proposed MFC to hastctl: compact 'status' and introduce 'list' command In-Reply-To: <20130524111945.GB12310@gmail.com> Message-ID: References: <20130524111945.GB12310@gmail.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (BSF 1167 2008-08-23) X-NCC-RegID: ru.rinet X-OpenPGP-Key-ID: 6B691B03 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (woozle.rinet.ru [0.0.0.0]); Mon, 27 May 2013 17:56:24 +0400 (MSK) Cc: trociny@freebsd.org, freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 13:56:33 -0000 On Fri, 24 May 2013, Mikolaj Golub wrote: > > > > http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/248291 > > > ... > > > > The reason I'm asking is that it could lead to changes in hast-related scripts > > > > which one use in production. > > > > > > > > > Any chance we could do this is 2 stages - first being to add 'list' to give us a chnace > > > ti change scripts over, then make the chnages to 'status'. I have scripts > > > which try and parse the outut from 'status' which will need changing, > > > and I sspect I am not the only one... > > > > I see no problem with this, as it is one-lite patch (modulo usage/manual page > > changes); it would be direct commit to -stable, but as it is temporary, I see > > no problem there too. > > > > Mikolaj, your opinion? > > It looks like a very good idea. Done for stable/9 and stable/8 as r251025 and r251026 I hope 6 weeks planned before cleanup will be enough for you and other current `hastctl list' consumers. -- Sincerely, D.Marck [DM5020, MCK-RIPE, DM3-RIPN] [ FreeBSD committer: marck@FreeBSD.org ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------ *** Dmitry Morozovsky --- D.Marck --- Wild Woozle --- marck@rinet.ru *** ------------------------------------------------------------------------