From owner-freebsd-hackers Tue Apr 2 20:59:10 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from elvis.mu.org (elvis.mu.org [192.203.228.196]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69D3737B41A for ; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 20:59:06 -0800 (PST) Received: by elvis.mu.org (Postfix, from userid 1192) id 326CDAE147; Tue, 2 Apr 2002 20:59:06 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 2 Apr 2002 20:59:06 -0800 From: Alfred Perlstein To: "Alton, Matthew" Cc: "'Hackers@FreeBSD.ORG'" Subject: Re: procfs development Message-ID: <20020403045906.GB93885@elvis.mu.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.27i Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG * Alton, Matthew [020402 16:18] wrote: > > I managed to glean from that the FreeBSD implementation > is basically a barebones interface that is only there for gdb to work > with. > > So has there been any talk of making the ctl file take > command/operands structs as input, and/or the status file offer > elaborate structures as output, or an lwp directory, etc? Not really, if someone where to present a patchset and documentation then it would likely be integrated. -- -Alfred Perlstein [alfred@freebsd.org] 'Instead of asking why a piece of software is using "1970s technology," start asking why software is ignoring 30 years of accumulated wisdom.' Tax deductible donations for FreeBSD: http://www.freebsdfoundation.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message