From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Jun 19 06:42:08 2003
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A08037B401
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 06:42:08 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from freebsd.org.ru (freebsd.org.ru [194.84.67.5])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60D7843F75
	for <freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 06:42:07 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from osa@freebsd.org.ru)
Received: by freebsd.org.ru (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 452A9313; Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:42:05 +0400 (MSD)
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:42:05 +0400
From: "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@FreeBSD.org>
To: "Igor B. Bykhalo" <goshik@binep.ac.ru>
Message-ID: <20030619134205.GK86248@freebsd.org.ru>
References: <20030618193910.GW86248@freebsd.org.ru>
	<029301c33667$7a1f2a20$ea2ce9c1@binep.ac.ru>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <029301c33667$7a1f2a20$ea2ce9c1@binep.ac.ru>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
cc: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: little heads up (for gigabase users)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD <freebsd-ports.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports>,
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2003 13:42:08 -0000

On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 05:34:10PM +0400, Igor B. Bykhalo wrote:
> > I'm planning to commit following patch for databases/gigabase.
> > It fix problem with database/fastdb port.
> > 
> > Both ports have a subsql and libcli_r.[a.so], but tool and libraries
> > of ports are
> > 1) uncompatible
> > 2) have the same names
> 
> I'm running oops+gigabase, should i just rebuild
> gigabase and then oops, or first i need to delete
> gigabase completely (and make sure there are no more
> old libraries left)?

I think oops port unaffect by this changes, because
oops use only gigabase_r.so.2 library, which name do not
change.
If you really need new (fixed) version of gigabase -
just upgrade gigabase port.

-- 

Rgdz,                        /"\  ASCII RIBBON CAMPAIGN
Sergey Osokin aka oZZ,       \ /    AGAINST HTML MAIL
http://ozz.pp.ru/             X          AND NEWS
                             / \