Date: Thu, 2 Feb 2012 12:15:14 -0500 From: Michael Scheidell <michael.scheidell@secnap.com> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Chris Rees <utisoft@gmail.com> Subject: Re: not for arch? use arch? don't care arch? Message-ID: <4F2AC4A2.9000400@secnap.com> In-Reply-To: <20120202170910.GB28461@lonesome.com> References: <4F296566.805@secnap.com> <20120202051921.GC6434@lonesome.com> <4F2A494F.5000807@secnap.com> <CADLo83-Xu6baHRejTuodABCTaTOJ_5x809iU23%2B2bnCSJ8=6TQ@mail.gmail.com> <20120202170910.GB28461@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2/2/12 12:09 PM, Mark Linimon wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 02, 2012 at 08:38:38AM +0000, Chris Rees wrote:
>> We don't build sparc packages, so no Pavmail.
> Gee, I sure *thought* I was building sparc64 packages:
>
> I send out mail whenever I mark things broken, but I don't necessarily
> expect anyone to take action, it's more FYI.
>
so, I get a lin_IM_ eh?
> mcl
--
Michael Scheidell, CTO
o: 561-999-5000
d: 561-948-2259
>*| *SECNAP Network Security Corporation
* Best Mobile Solutions Product of 2011
* Best Intrusion Prevention Product
* Hot Company Finalist 2011
* Best Email Security Product
* Certified SNORT Integrator
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned and certified safe by SpammerTrap(r).
For Information please see http://www.spammertrap.com/
______________________________________________________________________
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4F2AC4A2.9000400>