Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 09:00:49 -0700 (MST) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Jim Ohlstein <jim@ohlste.in> Cc: John Marino <freebsdml@marino.st>, Hrant Dadivanyan <hrant@dadivanyan.net>, FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Removing documentation Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.20.1602090852580.8217@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <56B9EDC7.1010403@ohlste.in> References: <E1aT6jw-000MGn-1T@pandora.amnic.net> <56B9D609.6030407@marino.st> <56B9EDC7.1010403@ohlste.in>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 9 Feb 2016, Jim Ohlstein wrote: > The build time of "like 20-30 minutes, at most" is ummm... let' just call it > optimistic. I only needed five new dependencies. Poudriere was unable to take > advantage of more than two parallel builders except for a rather short > overlap where it used three, if I recall correctly. The vast majority of the > time it used only one builder. Build and package time for gcc6-aux was 34:52 > on an Intel E5-2650 v3. Build and package time for binutils, required for > gcc6-aux, took 4:44. That's pretty close to 40 minutes for just two > dependencies, one of which is a dependency of the other. Build and package > time for synth was 1:09. 2:20, that's two hours and twenty minutes, to build and install here on an Atom N270 system. 2:06 for gcc6-aux, most of the rest for ncurses. That does not include distfile download time. Disk space used was 252M, again not counting the distfiles. For x86, the Atom is nearly worst-case, but I suspect the speed is similar to some of the ARM systems. I tried to build it last night on a fast i7 system for comparison, but gcc6-aux had a build error at the very start.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.20.1602090852580.8217>