Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2003 21:21:19 -0700 (PDT) From: Matthew Dillon <dillon@apollo.backplane.com> To: Mike Silbersack <silby@silby.com> Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Subject: Re: 4.x mbuf binary compatibility; can it be broken? Message-ID: <200307150421.h6F4LJCL082696@apollo.backplane.com> References: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0307141514410.40558-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> <20030714191735.Y8225@odysseus.silby.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
:> How does it get 255+ references?
:
:I don't know exactly at this point. I can reproduce the situation at will
:with (in kernel) test code, but I don't know what exactly causes it in the
:wild.
:
:Given that increasing the ref count limit is so easy, I was hoping to
:avoid spending time tracking down one degenerate case. :)
:
:Mike "Silby" Silbersack
If you just put a KASSERT() in for the 'reached 255' case the backtrace
will have a good chance of containing the likely culprit.
-Matt
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200307150421.h6F4LJCL082696>