From owner-freebsd-security Sun Sep 5 19:44:15 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 09F7C14FC4 for ; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 19:44:12 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id UAA33109; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 20:43:12 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id UAA01593; Sun, 5 Sep 1999 20:42:19 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199909060242.UAA01593@harmony.village.org> To: junkmale@xtra.co.nz Subject: Re: Security Alerts Cc: spork , freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 06 Sep 1999 14:38:49 +0100." <37d32939.64a9.0@actrix.gen.nz> References: <37d32939.64a9.0@actrix.gen.nz> Date: Sun, 05 Sep 1999 20:42:19 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org In message <37d32939.64a9.0@actrix.gen.nz> "Dan Langille" writes: : Fair enough. I wasn't considering any aspect of "official" whatsoever. If it is on the FreeBSD web pages, I really think that I'd at least need to approve the effort. I have no problem with doing that, I just don't want to read about it in a public list w/o even a heads up being sent to me. It lacks common courtesy. Maybe I'm just being grumpy. Warner To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message