From owner-freebsd-security Sat Dec 26 06:43:51 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id GAA04330 for freebsd-security-outgoing; Sat, 26 Dec 1998 06:43:51 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA04325 for ; Sat, 26 Dec 1998 06:43:49 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.1/8.9.1) id PAA93627; Sat, 26 Dec 1998 15:43:25 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: Gustavo Vieira G C Rios Cc: FreeBSD Security Subject: Re: qpopper References: <3681B710.66AFAD48@netshell.vicosa.com.br> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 26 Dec 1998 15:43:24 +0100 In-Reply-To: Gustavo Vieira G C Rios's message of "Thu, 24 Dec 1998 01:37:52 -0200" Message-ID: Lines: 11 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-freebsd-security@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Gustavo Vieira G C Rios writes: > Hi, i am a security paranoid, so i would like to know how secure is > qpopper (which is the best: qpopper or cucipop)? > How can i use xinetd and qpopper together? If you really were paranoid, you wouldn't run software that asks your users to type their passwords over an unencrypted TCP connection. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-security" in the body of the message