Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2003 16:19:45 +0900 From: Norikatsu Shigemura <nork@FreeBSD.org> To: David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, lioux@FreeBSD.org, nork@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: graphics/OpenEXR and USE_GCC Message-ID: <200302250719.h1P7JjqM021336@nd250009.gab.xdsl.ne.jp> In-Reply-To: <20030225005204.9806.qmail@web13504.mail.yahoo.com> References: <20030225005204.9806.qmail@web13504.mail.yahoo.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:52:04 -0800 (PST) David Yeske <dyeske@yahoo.com> wrote: > graphics/OpenEXR/Makefile sets USE_GCC to 3.1 > I removed the USE_GCC entry and I was able to compile it on a recent FreeBSD current system. > should the USE_GCC entry be wrapped with a OSVERSION test? I think so. I already received this problem. But, as possible as, I want to solve in bsd.port.mk like installation of USE_GCC=3.1+. This means that its own port is required gcc 3.1 or later. # I'll commit USE_GCC=3.1+ sample to graphics/OpenEXR/Makefile. > If I compile OpenEXR on a FreeBSD stable machine with gcc 3.1, than I can't link against OpenEXR > with filmgimp that is compiled with the stock compiler. I was able to make filmgimp work on > stable by making it also use gcc 3.1 > So what is the solution for these types of situations? Should filmgimp use gcc 3.1 on stable > because OpenEXR does, or is there a better way? Yes, Compile filmgimp with gcc 3.1 or lator. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200302250719.h1P7JjqM021336>