From owner-freebsd-current Thu Aug 29 13:24:41 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id NAA02803 for current-outgoing; Thu, 29 Aug 1996 13:24:41 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (spinner.DIALix.COM [192.203.228.67]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA02796 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 1996 13:24:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from spinner.DIALix.COM (localhost.DIALix.oz.au [127.0.0.1]) by spinner.DIALix.COM (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id EAA02973; Fri, 30 Aug 1996 04:21:26 +0800 (WST) Message-Id: <199608292021.EAA02973@spinner.DIALix.COM> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.7 5/3/96 To: Sujal Patel cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" , Peter Wemm , current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.sbin/bind - Imported sources In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 29 Aug 1996 16:15:06 -0400." Date: Fri, 30 Aug 1996 04:21:25 +0800 From: Peter Wemm Sender: owner-current@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Sujal Patel wrote: > On Thu, 29 Aug 1996, Rodney W. Grimes wrote: > > > GAG!!! This violates the BSD src tree paradigm of having the src tree > > layout reflect the installtion directory and your going to have to > > do a bunch of BINDIR=blah blah to make this work.... > > > > host, dig go in src/usr.bin > > named, ndc, nslookup go in src/usr.sbin > > named-xfer goes in src/libexec > > can we somehow have some symlinks from the "correct" spot to the spot in > the source tree. This has already become a problem with GNU software (I > can't always remember what's GNU and what isn't :-) > > Sujal Just a followup on what I said before.. I realise that just because the tree layout isn't completely pure elsewhere doesn't make this "ok" automatically. My defence was that I wasn't the first.. No, symlinks dont come through CVS, so it'll have to be moved if that's what is the right thing to do (which I'm happy to do). Cheers, -Peter