From owner-freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Sat Nov 24 11:53:51 2018 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 29370114C2C5 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 11:53:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from n6.nabble.com (n6.nabble.com [162.255.23.37]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DD05E75904 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 11:53:49 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jakub_lach@mailplus.pl) Received: from n6.nabble.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by n6.nabble.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D0ABAAC7D60 for ; Sat, 24 Nov 2018 04:53:42 -0700 (MST) Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 04:53:42 -0700 (MST) From: Jakub Lach To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Message-ID: <1543060422379-0.post@n6.nabble.com> Subject: 12-STABLE uname -a misses timestamp of the build MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: DD05E75904 X-Spamd-Result: default: False [1.88 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_SPF_FAIL(1.00)[-all]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.66)[0.656,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; TO_DN_NONE(0.00)[]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[freebsd-stable@freebsd.org]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.20)[0.204,0]; RCPT_COUNT_ONE(0.00)[1]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[mailplus.pl]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[mx.tlen.pl]; NEURAL_SPAM_LONG(0.04)[0.043,0]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE(0.00)[37.23.255.162.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.10.0]; RCVD_NO_TLS_LAST(0.10)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; IP_SCORE(-0.02)[asn: 21624(0.02), country: US(-0.09)]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21624, ipnet:162.255.20.0/22, country:US]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2] X-Rspamd-Server: mx1.freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 24 Nov 2018 11:53:51 -0000 Is there a way to restore it? I liked the old behaviour better, it was useful info for me. -- Sent from: http://freebsd.1045724.x6.nabble.com/freebsd-stable-f3932046.html