From owner-cvs-src@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Apr 27 14:41:17 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: cvs-src@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0910D16A4CE; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:41:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc12.comcast.net (sccrmhc12.comcast.net [204.127.202.56]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8B7F043D1F; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:41:16 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from julian@elischer.org) Received: from interjet.elischer.org ([24.7.73.28]) by comcast.net (sccrmhc12) with ESMTP id <20040427214113012002s6gve>; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:41:15 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id OAA61502; Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:41:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 14:41:11 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: Poul-Henning Kamp In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org cc: "M. Warner Losh" Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/boot/i386/boot0 Makefile boot0.sboot0_512.s boot0sio.s X-BeenThere: cvs-src@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: CVS commit messages for the src tree List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 21:41:17 -0000 errr.. On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Julian Elischer wrote: > > > On Tue, 27 Apr 2004, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > > In message <20040427.131322.102770380.imp@bsdimp.com>, "M. Warner Losh" writes: > > > > >Shouldn't this be boot0_512.S since it is pre-processed? > > It has been the convention since before I made the first bootblocks. ^ generic obviously there were bootblocks befoe that.. I ported teh MACH bootblocks and one of the things I had to do was to fiddle with filenames from .s to .S and change the comments to suit. Gosh that was a long time ago... > The Makefiles know how to produce a .s from a .S using the C > preprocessor. > (or did I get this the other way around :-) > > > > > If we have such a convention: yes. I wasn't aware of it. > > > > -- > > Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 > > phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 > > FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe > > Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. > > > >