From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org  Thu Feb 25 05:10:27 2016
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE839AB2C91
 for <freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org>;
 Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:10:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB18F13DA
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:10:27 +0000 (UTC)
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id u1P5AR6N032435
 for <freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:10:27 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 196944] [bge] [ipmi] regression IPMI access disabled when bge
 driver is loaded
Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:10:27 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: CC
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Base System
X-Bugzilla-Component: kern
X-Bugzilla-Version: 10.3-BETA2
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: regression
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Some People
X-Bugzilla-Who: yongari@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Status: Open
X-Bugzilla-Resolution: 
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: yongari@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Flags: mfc-stable9? mfc-stable10?
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-196944-2472-pB9k0ZQ4Mr@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-196944-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-196944-2472@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Feb 2016 05:10:27 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=3D196944

--- Comment #7 from Pyun YongHyeon <yongari@FreeBSD.org> ---
(In reply to Andrew Daugherity from comment #6)
Thanks for PXE related clue. But I've confused with ifconfig/dhclient
command.  When did you run those commands?
bge(4) does not report current link speed if the interface
is not UP.  So if you can see established link it means you
initialized/upped the controller.
By upping interface bge(4) will initialize the controller which in turn
will touch many registers.  The same is true for dhclient(8).  The first
thing dhclint(8) does is UP the interface.

In order not to touch bge(4) H/W in bge_init(), you should not have any
'ifconfig_bge0=3Dxxxx' line in rc.conf.  What I'd like to know is whether
IPMI is broken by bge_attach() call. Could you check it?

--=20
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.=