From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 10 19:29:24 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2346316A402 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:29:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from server.baldwin.cx (66-23-211-162.clients.speedfactory.net [66.23.211.162]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 908D543D45 for ; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:29:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) Received: from localhost (john@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by server.baldwin.cx (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id k3AJTJ4c009648; Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:29:19 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from jhb@freebsd.org) From: John Baldwin To: "Conrad J. Sabatier" Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 15:28:29 -0400 User-Agent: KMail/1.9.1 References: <20060329020527.f8f087a4.conrads@cox.net> <200604031152.27109.jhb@freebsd.org> <20060410132427.3d01417b.conrads@cox.net> In-Reply-To: <20060410132427.3d01417b.conrads@cox.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200604101528.31794.jhb@freebsd.org> X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.87.1/1389/Mon Apr 10 08:58:55 2006 on server.baldwin.cx X-Virus-Status: Clean X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.0 required=4.2 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,AWL,BAYES_00 autolearn=ham version=3.1.0 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.1.0 (2005-09-13) on server.baldwin.cx Cc: bms@spc.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: device atpic to be deprecated? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:29:24 -0000 On Monday 10 April 2006 14:24, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > On Mon, 3 Apr 2006 11:52:25 -0400 > John Baldwin wrote: > > On Sunday 02 April 2006 07:07, Conrad J. Sabatier wrote: > > > On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:15:54 -0500 > > > John Baldwin wrote: > > > > > > > > I have to make sure it really works for everyone first though > > > > before removing it would really be viable. :-/ > > > > > > So, would it be necessary to upgrade to HEAD in order to make sure > > > that this problem won't still occur on my box? Or has this stuff > > > already been merged to STABLE? > > > > This particular bunch of code is identical in HEAD and 6.x right > > now, so we can probably debug it on STABLE just fine. > > Well, some testing with my latest STABLE source update (Fri, Apr 7) > exhibits the same problems. > > I can boot the kernel and mount root OK with or without ACPI enabled > (via the loader tunable hint.acpi.0.disabled), but not without atpic. > > I can even boot OK without "device acpi" compiled into the kernel > explicitly (and with no acpi module, either, of course, as this > doesn't get built under amd64), but without atpic and the associated > ACPI bits it pulls in, it's a definite show-stopper. > > Another interesting side effect I've noticed is that without acpi, the > built-in nVidia sound chip (with the snd_ich driver compiled in) is not > recognized either. I've lost the context.. Can you provide a verbose dmesg both with and without 'device atpic'? -- John Baldwin <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/ "Power Users Use the Power to Serve" = http://www.FreeBSD.org