Date: Tue, 11 Aug 1998 12:11:14 +0200 (CEST) From: cracauer@cons.org To: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.ORG Cc: andreas@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: ports/7572: qt-133 /usr/local vs. /usr/X11R6 mismatch Message-ID: <199808111011.MAA02589@counter.bik-gmbh.de>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 7572 >Category: ports >Synopsis: The qt-1.33 make package fails >Confidential: no >Severity: serious >Priority: medium >Responsible: freebsd-ports >State: open >Quarter: >Keywords: >Date-Required: >Class: sw-bug >Submitter-Id: current-users >Arrival-Date: Tue Aug 11 03:20:00 PDT 1998 >Last-Modified: >Originator: Martin Cracauer >Organization: >Release: FreeBSD 2.2.6-STABLE i386 >Environment: Newest port of qt-1.33 on -stable. >Description: The port tries to install the libraries and the binaries to $(X11BASE), while the rest of the port is being installed to /usr/local That's bad, since the packaging list isn't prepared to do so and looks for libraries and bin/moc in /usr/local/, hence "make package" fails. >How-To-Repeat: cd /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt133 && make all install package >Fix: By using a special "do-install" definition, "Makefile" tries to relocate each part. This obviously isn't though to the end. Quick fix: s/$(X11BASE)/$(PREFIX)/ in Makefile. You might think over the concept of installing parts to X11BASE and other parts to PREFIX, I think it's highly ugly to have libs in /usr/X11R6/lib and the includefiles to use these libs in /usr/local/include/X11. Choose one location for the whole port, please. >Audit-Trail: >Unformatted: To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199808111011.MAA02589>