Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 15 Dec 2015 15:52:12 +0100
From:      Bengt Ahlgren <bengta@sics.se>
To:        Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: ZFS hang in zfs_freebsd_rename
Message-ID:  <uh7vb7zhihv.fsf@P142s.sics.se>
In-Reply-To: <567022FB.1010508@multiplay.co.uk> (Steven Hartland's message of "Tue, 15 Dec 2015 14:26:03 %2B0000")
References:  <uh7a8pbj2mo.fsf@P142s.sics.se> <567022FB.1010508@multiplay.co.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Yes, that is on the todo list...

So this is likely fixed then in 10.x?

Bengt

Steven Hartland <killing@multiplay.co.uk> writes:

> Not a surprise in 9.x unfortunately, try upgrading to 10.x
>
> On 15/12/2015 12:51, Bengt Ahlgren wrote:
>> We have a server running 9.3-REL which currenly has two quite large zfs
>> pools:
>>
>> NAME   SIZE  ALLOC   FREE    CAP  DEDUP  HEALTH  ALTROOT
>> p1    18.1T  10.7T  7.38T    59%  1.00x  ONLINE  -
>> p2    43.5T  29.1T  14.4T    66%  1.00x  ONLINE  -
>>
>> It has been running without any issues for some time now.  Once, just
>> now, processes are getting stuck and impossible to kill on accessing a
>> particular directory in the p2 pool.  That pool is a 2x6 disk raidz2.
>>
>> One process is stuck in zfs_freebsd_rename, and other processes
>> accessing that particular directory also get stuck.  The system is now
>> almost completely idle.
>>
>> Output from kgdb on the running system for that first process:
>>
>> Thread 651 (Thread 102157):
>> #0  sched_switch (td=0xfffffe0b14059920, newtd=0xfffffe001633e920, flags=<value optimized out>)
>>      at /usr/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c:1904
>> #1  0xffffffff808f4604 in mi_switch (flags=260, newtd=0x0) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_synch.c:485
>> #2 0xffffffff809308e2 in sleepq_wait (wchan=0xfffffe0135b60488,
>> pri=96) at /usr/src/sys/kern/subr_sleepqueue.c:618
>> #3  0xffffffff808cf922 in __lockmgr_args (lk=0xfffffe0135b60488, flags=524544, ilk=0xfffffe0135b604b8,
>>      wmesg=<value optimized out>, pri=<value optimized out>, timo=<value optimized out>,
>>      file=0xffffffff80f0d782 "/usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c", line=2337) at /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_lock.c:221
>> #4  0xffffffff80977369 in vop_stdlock (ap=<value optimized out>) at lockmgr.h:97
>> #5  0xffffffff80dd4a04 in VOP_LOCK1_APV (vop=0xffffffff813e8160, a=0xffffffa07f935520) at vnode_if.c:2052
>> #6  0xffffffff80998c17 in _vn_lock (vp=0xfffffe0135b603f0, flags=524288,
>>      file=0xffffffff80f0d782 "/usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c", line=2337) at vnode_if.h:859
>> #7  0xffffffff8098b621 in vputx (vp=0xfffffe0135b603f0, func=1) at /usr/src/sys/kern/vfs_subr.c:2337
>> #8  0xffffffff81ac7955 in zfs_rename_unlock (zlpp=0xffffffa07f9356b8)
>>      at /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c:3609
>> #9  0xffffffff81ac8c72 in zfs_freebsd_rename (ap=<value optimized out>)
>>      at /usr/src/sys/modules/zfs/../../cddl/contrib/opensolaris/uts/common/fs/zfs/zfs_vnops.c:4039
>> #10 0xffffffff80dd4f04 in VOP_RENAME_APV (vop=0xffffffff81b47d40, a=0xffffffa07f9358e0) at vnode_if.c:1522
>> #11 0xffffffff80996bbd in kern_renameat (td=<value optimized out>, oldfd=<value optimized out>,
>>      old=<value optimized out>, newfd=-100, new=0x1826a9af00 <Error reading address 0x1826a9af00: Bad address>,
>>      pathseg=<value optimized out>) at vnode_if.h:636
>> #12 0xffffffff80cd228a in amd64_syscall (td=0xfffffe0b14059920, traced=0) at subr_syscall.c:135
>> #13 0xffffffff80cbc907 in Xfast_syscall () at /usr/src/sys/amd64/amd64/exception.S:396
>> ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
>> #14 0x0000000800cc1acc in ?? ()
>> Previous frame inner to this frame (corrupt stack?)
>>
>> Full procstat -kk -a and kgdb "thread apply all bt" can be found here:
>>
>> https://www.sics.se/~bengta/ZFS-hang/
>>
>> I don't know how to produce "alltrace in ddb" as the instructions in the
>> wiki says.  It runs the GENERIC kernel, so perhaps it isn't possible?
>>
>> I checked "camcontrol tags" for all the disks in the pool - all have
>> zeroes for dev_active, devq_queued and held.
>>
>> Is there anything else I can check while the machine is up?  I however
>> need to restart it pretty soon.
>>
>> Bengt
>> _______________________________________________
>> freebsd-fs@freebsd.org mailing list
>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-fs
>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-fs-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?uh7vb7zhihv.fsf>