From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 23 17:00:53 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D19516A4F2 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:00:53 +0000 (GMT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 304A343D45 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:00:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) i6NH0pCY032994 for ; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:00:51 GMT (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6NH0p8j032992; Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:00:51 GMT (envelope-from gnats) Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:00:51 GMT Message-Id: <200407231700.i6NH0p8j032992@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: Thomas-Martin Seck Subject: Re: ports/69487: [Maintainer] www/squid: use OpenLDAP 2.1 X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: Thomas-Martin Seck List-Id: Ports bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 17:00:53 -0000 The following reply was made to PR ports/69487; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Thomas-Martin Seck To: Oliver Eikemeier Cc: Subject: Re: ports/69487: [Maintainer] www/squid: use OpenLDAP 2.1 Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2004 18:51:26 +0200 * Oliver Eikemeier (eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com): > Thomas-Martin Seck wrote: > > >[...] > >This issue does not seem to be related to the vendor patch against the > >LDAP authentication helpers as I originally thought (see ports/69465) > >but > >until this issue is sorted out upstream, keep leaving this patch alone > >since I cannot test LDAP authentication myself yet. > > I believe this is caused by the vendor patch and does in no way releate > to the OpenLDAP version used. The vendor patch breaks -H, -P and > authentication. You are probably right, but... [...] > You shouldn't be able to authenticate or crash. > > Again: I can't see any signs that this relates to the OpenLDAP version > used. This sounds plausible, too, unfortunately I do not have an LDAP server to test against and squid bug #1018 says "with OpenLDAP 2.1 it works" and when I asked Edwin Groothuis for feedback he said the vendor patch would make no difference, the problem depended on the OpenLDAP version. So for me the problem /seems/ to be OpenLDAP 2.2. I have to believe what I am told so until I get a clear statement about the cause of the problem I like to revert the port to a known good state ASAP. /Should work/ has bitten me too often, so I am bit reluctant to believe this (no offence meant!). I am a bit at a loss now, because I want to avoid to break user's setups when they upgrade squid and OpenLDAP at the same time, mostly because I do not have any positive feedback wrt OpenLDAP 2.2, that's all. If I had, things were easier for me, so everyone using the OpenLDAP 2.2 client libraries for squid authentication is invited to mail success stories to me :) Anyway: if you have not done so already please connect Henrik Nordström and try to sort this out with him. I am convinced both of you can collaborate on this and come to a solution really quickly.