From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 26 23:40:29 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B3848F66 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 23:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.palmen-it.de (stef.palmen-it.de [IPv6:2a01:198:49d:1::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 75D343E5 for ; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 23:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from nexus.home.palmen-it.de ([192.168.99.2] helo=nexus.localnet) by mail.palmen-it.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XtmCB-0002LT-Hc for freebsd-current@freebsd.org; Wed, 26 Nov 2014 23:40:27 +0000 From: Felix Palmen To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iwn(4) crashing when wlan device is brought up, CA-N-6200 Date: Thu, 27 Nov 2014 00:40:23 +0100 Message-ID: <708524702.PpP0DOIPdV@nexus> User-Agent: KMail/4.14.1 (Linux/3.16.1-ck1; KDE/4.14.2; x86_64; ; ) In-Reply-To: References: <1734439.MVPFiyHCOv@nexus> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 192.168.99.2 X-SA-Exim-Rcpt-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: felix@palmen-it.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on mail.palmen-it.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 23:40:29 -0000 Hi Adrian, Am Mittwoch, 26. November 2014, 09:27:32 schrieb Adrian Chadd: > Oh! Please file a PR for this. Done, https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla//show_bug.cgi?id=195433 > This is two problems: > > * the NIC isn't being setup fully correctly - I'll see if i have an > Intel 6200 in my pile-o-nics; > * .. and the re-initialise path is slightly broken it seems and it's > panicing. :) I thought so, the page fault leading to the panic happens during a re- initialization attempt. A single PR is still ok? I guess further conversation should take place through the PR now ... just in case, if it helps debugging, I could build the kernel with full debugging capabilities and provide the dumped core. Thanks for your reply! BR, Felix