From owner-freebsd-chat  Mon Mar  3 20:04:12 1997
Return-Path: <owner-chat>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id UAA21190
          for chat-outgoing; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 20:04:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from alpha.risc.org (taob@[205.233.216.202])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id UAA21185
          for <freebsd-chat@freebsd.org>; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 20:04:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: from localhost (taob@localhost)
          by alpha.risc.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with SMTP
	  id XAA16689; Mon, 3 Mar 1997 23:01:54 -0500 (EST)
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 23:01:53 -0500 (EST)
From: Brian Tao <taob@risc.org>
To: Charles Henrich <henrich@crh.cl.msu.edu>
cc: hasty@rah.star-gate.com, freebsd-chat@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: 2.2 Compiler slower than 2.1? (was RSA 56-bit key challenge)
In-Reply-To: <199703040216.VAA00986@crh.cl.msu.edu>
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.95.970303230052.16666B-100000@alpha.risc.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-chat@freebsd.org
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

On Mon, 3 Mar 1997, Charles Henrich wrote:
> 
> Unfortunatly I probably will not be able to leave the code running
> for a long period of time, but I wanted to be at the top for a few
> hours anyway :)

    What is the machine normally used for?  If it is allowable,
setting up a cron job to start a bunch of clients after work hours and
killing it before the day starts again would still be a great help.
--
Brian Tao (BT300, taob@risc.org)
"Though this be madness, yet there is method in't"